canspice.org

home about code feeds archives links

Steve Dale: Dangerous to the environment

In the November 2-4 2007 edition of USA Weekend, Steve Dale answered some questions from pet owners. One of them was from a ferret owner who recently moved to California, only to find out that ferrets are banned there. Dale’s response was as follows:

I think it’s crazy, too. Some are worried that ferrets, over time, would get outdoors and form wild colonies, like cats who get outside sometimes do. Then, to survive, the former pet ferrets would become savage and indulge in meals of endangered waterfowl. However, domestic ferrets who get lost typically starve to death. And the overwhelming majority of pet ferrets are purchased spayed or neutered, so it’s impossible for any who might live long enough to be able to find a partner and procreate.

Hawaii and California are the only states that ban ferrets. Yet no state currently has a problem with marauding colonies of feral ferrets.

I think the law banning ferrets is ridiculous, and I once proposed a solution to guarantee that any ferrets who get out won’t cause a problem: Mandate spaying/neutering (as I said before, they are usually altered anyway), rabies vaccines and microchipping (so that animal control will know who the careless owners are who repeatedly misplace their pet ferrets).

This kind of advice might work on the mainland, but it doesn’t work in Hawaii. Let’s pick apart his argument:
Dale says “domestic ferrets who get lost typically starve to death.” This means that there are some domestic ferrets who don’t starve to death.

Dale says “the overwhelming majority of pet ferrets are purchased spayed or neutered.” This means that there are some pet ferrets that aren’t spayed or neutered.

Dale then says that because of these two things “it’s impossible for any who might live long enough to be able to find a partner and procreate.” This is completely wrong. You can’t get “impossible” from two very possible things.

Dale states that “Hawaii and California are the only states that ban ferrets.” True. What he doesn’t say is why they’ve banned ferrets. Hawaii has banned them because they may be carriers of the rabies virus. Hawaii is rabies-free and we’d like to keep it that way. Further, Hawaii’s ecosystem is fragile, and given ferrets’ carnivorous diet of small prey such as birds and mice, the accidental introduction of ferrets into that ecosystem could prove to be costly to the endangered bird populations here.

So Steve Dale, when you say that the ban on ferrets is “crazy”, I think you need to think about it a little bit first. Do a little research before you write. Your careless column may only serve to weaken the efforts put forth by our state to keep our islands rabies-free and to keep invasive species off our islands.

Tags: , , , ,

5 Responses to “Steve Dale: Dangerous to the environment”

[...] canspice.org wrote an interesting post today on Steve Dale: Dangerous to the environmentHere’s a quick excerpt In the November 2-4 2007 edition of USA Weekend, Steve Dale answered some questions from pet owners. One of them was from a ferret owner who recently moved to California, only to find out that ferrets are banned there. Dale’s response was as follows: I think it’s crazy, too. Some are worried that ferrets, over time, would get outdoors and form wild colonies, like cats who get outside sometimes do. Then, to survive, the former pet ferrets would become savage and indulge in meals of endangered w [...]

 
comment from douglas
Mon Nov 5 2007
1:04 pm

Have you failed to close a blockquote or something, there?

 
comment from Frossie
Mon Nov 5 2007
2:23 pm

Oh please.

“Hawaii has banned them because they may be carriers of the rabies virus. Hawaii is rabies-free and we’d like to keep it that way.”

Err yes. However Hawaii does allow people to own dogs and cats even though they can carry rabies. People can bring them here provided they are vaccinated and clear quarantine. Why not ferrets?

“Further, Hawaii’s ecosystem is fragile, and given ferrets’ carnivorous diet of small prey such as birds and mice, the accidental introduction of ferrets into that ecosystem could prove to be costly to the endangered bird populations here.”

This from a cat owner? Outdoor cats and mongooses have already taken care of the bird population in Hawaii.

The problems are not ferrets per se, they are the fact that agencies cannot be bothered to deal with non dog-and-cat pets (in fact in administrative language the word pets often is taken to be identical to “dogs and cats”), so have blanket rules instead of specific ones. California has huge land borders with ferret-allowing states, and banning responsible ferret ownership does indeed strike me as silly.

Another example of this is that it is illegal to let a rabbit set foot on the ground in Hawaii. Yes, it is to stop us turning into Australia (laudable goal) but instead of having a specific rule for breedable rabbits, a person’s spayed geriatric paralysed bunny can get shot if its owner allows it to sun itself on a bit of lawn.

Fundamentally, most agencies would not even consider there can be such a thing as a neutered rabbit or ferret or (insert other non-mainstream pet here). Both Hawaii and California could make exceptions for animals with a veterinary certificate stating they cannot breed.

It’s nice to have grand concerns for the ecosystem, but it usually just boils down to the fact that the dog and cat lobbies are much bigger it’s not politically expedient to stand up to them. Otherwise Hawaiians would be out there shooting cats.

 
comment from Brad
Mon Nov 5 2007
4:14 pm

I don’t know why ferrets aren’t allowed to clear quarantine. That quote about rabies came from a Hawaii Department of Agriculture website.

Yes, I wholeheartedly agree that cats have ravaged the wild bird population in Hawaii. That’s not an argument for allowing ferrets, though, and is actually an argument against allowing ferrets, because they show what can happen if a carnivorous species is let loose.

Neutering animals is fine and dandy, but let’s be realistic: people are lazy and won’t get their animals fixed. We have friends with cats that we’ve offered to take to the vet and have them fixed at our own expense, and they’re too lazy to let us. Sure, there are responsible owners out there who get their animals fixed and give them the full range of shots, but responsible owners are few and far between.

 

Leave a Reply

Name (required)
Mail (required)
Website
Comments