<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Baby Names: Quantity, Not Quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canspice.org/2008/08/26/bad-baby-names-quantity-not-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canspice.org/2008/08/26/bad-baby-names-quantity-not-quality/</link>
	<description>all about a canadian guy living in hawaii</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bad Baby Names: Neither Quantity Nor Quality :: canspice.org</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2008/08/26/bad-baby-names-quantity-not-quality/#comment-49067</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Baby Names: Neither Quantity Nor Quality :: canspice.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=589#comment-49067</guid>
		<description>[...] last week&#8217;s bumper crop I suppose a letdown is in order. A letdown is what we got with today&#8217;s Bad Baby Names. Just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week&#8217;s bumper crop I suppose a letdown is in order. A letdown is what we got with today&#8217;s Bad Baby Names. Just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2008/08/26/bad-baby-names-quantity-not-quality/#comment-48848</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=589#comment-48848</guid>
		<description>Very nice, that's a solid crop this time around. Though Beau is a fairly common first name, I've actually known at least three of them in my life, and there are several historical Beaus, both male and female. I suspect that Bo is really just an anglicized/simplified version of the name. With a little research, one might be able to make an argument that "Bo" is the travesty here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, that&#8217;s a solid crop this time around. Though Beau is a fairly common first name, I&#8217;ve actually known at least three of them in my life, and there are several historical Beaus, both male and female. I suspect that Bo is really just an anglicized/simplified version of the name. With a little research, one might be able to make an argument that &#8220;Bo&#8221; is the travesty here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
