<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>canspice.org &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canspice.org/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canspice.org</link>
	<description>all about a canadian guy living in canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare stories</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2009/08/14/healthcare-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2009/08/14/healthcare-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine & Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uhc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=1141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These anecdotes originally came from a thread on Something Awful, and were distilled down to this pastebin, but I&#8217;m copying them here to make them a little more readable. Enjoy the differences between the US health care system and those in countries that offer universal health care. I live in Victoria, BC, Canada, and when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These anecdotes originally came from a thread on Something Awful, and were distilled down to <a href="http://pastebin.ca/1527084">this pastebin</a>, but I&#8217;m copying them here to make them a little more readable. Enjoy the differences between the US health care system and those in countries that offer universal health care.</p>
<blockquote><p>I live in Victoria, BC, Canada, and when I was twenty years old I fell down a flight of forty stairs at a local night club, cleanly breaking my ulna and nigh-shattering my radius. It was bad enough that I required steel plates and pins which remain in my forearm to this day. I broke it on the Friday night, stayed in a small but comfortable ward in the hospital with four other patients until my surgery on the Sunday morning. I stayed in the hospital the Sunday night, then asked if I could stay the Monday as well and talk to a physiotherapist about what I should do to have the bones heal as quickly as possible with minimal muscle damage/loss. They obliged. I wasn&#8217;t feeling so hot after talking to physio, so I was offered a further night&#8217;s stay at the hospital, which I accepted. So in all, I was in hospital from Friday night until Tuesday morning.</p>
<p>Total cost to me for a three day hospital stay, surgery, and eventual rehabilitation: if I recall correctly, I paid $50 for my full-arm cast.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I live in Massachusetts, where health care is mandatory. Since I run a start-up business and don&#8217;t make a ton of money, I was able to sign up for the state health care plan.My doctor works 3 minutes from my office, I was able to pick her myself. I have a $10 co-pay, and since I&#8217;m a healthy male, my visits are infrequent. I love my state run health plan.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I impaled my knee during a boating accident, and spent 11 hours in the ER to receive 3 stitches, a cast, and crutches. This was in a hospital that is run by a privately held business.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Two weeks ago I went in and waited four hours for a sprained knee, but at least I got in and had x-rays done cause I could barely walk and they thought it&#8217;d been [messed] up badly. Then again, four years ago they [messed] up my gallbladder surgery and kept kicking me out of ER every three days afterward because I would go in screaming in agony, and one ER doc told me I was making it up for attention.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good and bad. At least I don&#8217;t have to pay thousands of dollars for it.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I live in the UK, and for me the best part of the National Health Service here is the flat-rate prescription charging system. If you go to a doctor (which is free) and they prescribe you some sort of medicine, it costs you 13 to get it, no matter what it is. This means that my mother gets 1000 worth of injections for her rheumatoid arthritis every month for the low, low price of 13.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>[United States] My wife went in for cancer and they fixed her up pretty quickly. They cut her thyroid and the cancer out shortly after discovery. Only charged us $37,500 and counting for its removal. Well that includes the the routine bloodwork that costs $65 a pop. The scripts that run 35$ a month for the rest of her life. The extra surgery cause a lymph node swelled up and they had to make sure it hadn&#8217;t spread, the colonoscopy cause she was having problems in that area, and they had to make sure it hadn&#8217;t spread.</p>
<p>Really don&#8217;t know what everyones always complaining about. I mean whats wrong with paying $400-$500 a month in copays to nuclear meds, radiologists, ob&#8217;s, ear nose and throat, endo&#8217;s, general, etc as they play ping-poss with your ass.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m in the US and I have health care through my employer. My primary care physician has a 3 hour wait no matter what time of the day you go. In the waiting room, there&#8217;s about 50 of the newest drug pamphlets sitting on a table for you to look at, so you can ask him about them, and he can prescribe them to you if they fit your illness. I have to get a referral to go to any special doctor. At most of those doctors, I have a 2 week wait from when I make my appointment. I am actually considered by most to have &#8220;excellent&#8221; health care.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m a Canadian, and I have a few very serious food allergies that send me into immediate anaphylactic shock. It&#8217;s only occurred a few times in my life, but each time an ambulance was at my house in 5-10 min and I was immediately taken care of properly at the nearest hospital. No brutal waiting times, nothing like that, just zipped in and treated. Most of the people experiencing long wait times are sitting there with a broken arm feeling all angry because they keep treating newly arriving heart attack patients or something. It&#8217;s not like the doctors are smoking joints in the bathroom while people wait, they just constantly re-organize the waiting list according the medical priority of the incoming patients.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>A few years ago there was something wrong with my back where I was in constant pain all the time, so I made an apointment with my family doctor for the following week. He sent me off to get an X-ray at the x-ray clinic &#8211; it&#8217;s a walk-in clinic where you just hand them the doctor&#8217;s form and wait for the couple of people before you.</p>
<p>My Doctor made another appointment for me to come in the next week to tell me the results of the x-ray; turns out I had a compression fracture on my L2 vertabrae. I got scheduled for a bone scan the following week to get some more information since I didn&#8217;t remember any sort of trauma that would cause that. Luckily there was a place on my university campus that could do the bone scan, so I ended up going there between classes.</p>
<p>After getting the bone scan back, he scheduled me for a CT scan, which I had to wait about 3 weeks for. It was a bit of a longer of a wait than I would have liked but since I couldn&#8217;t do anything about it I just ended up being a good Canadian and put up with it. I get the CT scan in the morning, and in the afternoon I get a call from my doctor &#8220;We need you to go in for an MRI tomorrow&#8221;. None of this waiting for the next available spot, they saw something serious and got me in the next day (made me feel OK about wait times&#8230;in my case anyway).</p>
<p>The MRI shows a tumor on my vertabrae, so they schedule me to come in for a biopsy the next day. I also got referred to an orthopedist who I saw later that week and scheduled a surgery about a month later to get the tumor out and fuse my spine up. I could have put the surgery sooner, but the school term was just about done and I wanted to get my finals over with.</p>
<p>I get my surgery and it turns out the tumor was a little more malignant that hoped so I get referred to an oncologist and the Cross Cancer Institute (the local cancer hospital). I start on chemo the next week which continues for the summer, and then just to be sure they killed all the cancer cells they decide to give me radiation therapy too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve since moved to a smaller town which means it takes me a full day (including travel) to go in for my 6-month &#8220;your cancer is still gone&#8221; checkup. Happily, travel and expenses (such as food and an overnight hotel room) for medical appointments are tax deductible.</p>
<p>So overall it was pretty much a year if medical &#8220;fun&#8221;. I did have to wait a little longer for some things than I would have liked (mainly the CT scan), but there wasn&#8217;t anything that I found unreasonable. Not to mention the only costs that I (my parents) had to pay for were some anti-nausea pills for the chemo, some morphene after the surgery, and getting the TV in the hospital room turned on.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>About a decade ago my mom had a life-threatening blood clot form in her brain. I no longer specifically recall what made this particular clotting special, but it differed from a stroke in some key fashion, was the second case of it&#8217;s type in the country, and was later featured in some journal.</p>
<p>From the time she was admitted, she was transferred to Winnipeg (about three hours away), MRIed three times (MRI wait-times are often touted as an issue here for some reason), diagnosed, and had the specialist that had dealt with the only other recorded case of this type of blood clotting in Canadian medical history flown in from Calgary to perform the surgery, it was less than three days.</p>
<p>So, from admission to brain surgery by the best-suited doctor in the nation in less than three days. Cost-wise, the only thing that needed paying for was the three-hour ambulance trip (about $1k), and even that was later reimbursed because of her workplace Blue Cross.</p>
<p>These days she has some pills (because the cost of her drugs exceed x amount per year, they&#8217;re covered) she needs to take to prevent reduce the chance of any clotting from reoccurring. She manages her diet, and every month checks in with her doctor for some blood-work, the same doctor who originally had her admitted and sent to Winnipeg all those years ago.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I recently had a kidney stone. I kind of knew what it was, but if you&#8217;ve ever had one you know that it can be excruciatingly painful. Against my better judgment and influenced by extreme pain, I went to the emergency room without insurance. Just as the conservatives like to point out, I was able to receive care despite my lack of insurance. My bill for the three hours I spent in the emergency room was around $13,000. I had to laugh because it was just so obscenely expensive.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I had a kidney stone once before in Italy. I went to a hospital, received excellent care with less waiting, and when I had passed the stone I walked out of the hospital without even filling out any additional paperwork.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>[United States] My fianc&eacute;e is in a real bind; she left her last job and her new job doesn&#8217;t offer insurance: she&#8217;s paying month to month on a private plan and I think it costs her about $200 a month. She decided to up herself to the better plan &#8211; $40 more a month, I think &#8211; to reduce her deductible from $1,000 to $200. She had to go to the eye doctor last month and I think it cost her something like $180; she had to beg the doctor to give her sample eye-drops for the infection because her insurance wouldn&#8217;t cover the prescription drops and they were around $150. She&#8217;s scared to death of something really bad happening to her.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Portuguese posting here. The only time I had to stay in a hospital was for an emergency appendicitis surgery. I had to wait about 2 hours for a doctor to see me, but I wasn&#8217;t too bad yet, it was in the middle of a bad heat wave (40C every day for a week) and there were a lot of old people with dehydration there. A few hours later I was cut open and set right, stayed there for 2 nights, and then they kicked me out, fully healed, with a pat on the back and a bill for 0, which is about $0 USD.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m here in the UK, and I love socialised medicine, I was a very sickly child, and would probably be deaf now if it wasn&#8217;t for the NHS. I had 2 operations on my ears when I was about 5, when my parents were young. I can&#8217;t imagine how different my upbringing would have been if every extra penny my parents were earning was going on paying medical bills from 20 years ago.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Last year I was diagnosed with cancer. The total amount of time between the first ultrasound and my stay in the hospital for surgery was about three weeks. In between I got x-rays, a CT scan, more ultrasounds, and saw an oncologist.  After surgery, I had multiple rounds of preventative chemotherapy to lower the chances of recurrence from 15% to 5%. I&#8217;ve since been back to the cancer agency repeatedly for screening.  In total, I paid about fifty bucks to fill a prescription for anti-nausea medication. I am damn glad I live in Canada where healthcare is there regardless.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I broke my collarbone three days ago riding my bike. I went to the E.R, didn&#8217;t wait a minute, and got sent to a bed. There, a doctor looked at it and said I would probably need surgery because it ran the risk of poking through my skin. The next morning I got the surgery done, and after 4 hours in the O.R. had a metal plate on my clavicle. I stayed the night because IV drugs were needed after the surgery so I didn&#8217;t get any infections. I paid only about 10$ for the T3s for pain relief.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m in Canada. In 2005 I had a breast reduction totally covered by OHIP, as I was having related back problems (which only would have become a more expensive problem). I started the process in late April/early May, and had it done in July &#8211; that time included choosing a surgeon, preliminary appointments, getting documentation from my family doctor, etc. My life has been a lot easier since then. I know that this can cost thousands elsewhere, and I definitely did not have that kind of money.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve moved around in recent years, and haven&#8217;t had a family doctor during that time. I&#8217;ve been getting my annual pap smears, breast exams, birth control prescriptions etc through local health unit clinics. These clinics book appointments in advance if you have a health card (and run walk-ins for those who don&#8217;t), and are staffed by women I actually like a lot better than my old family doctor anyway. The check-ups and tests are free, birth control can be had at reduced costs.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>For some reason my mother in law was almost denied a new hip because she is 65 years old. I was pretty shocked since her and her husband paid into the system for so long and she was in overall good health. Once she was able to find a doctor that would operate and give her the type of replacement she wanted the waiting time was 8 months. After searching online I was able to find a doctor with only a two month wait. Four weeks ago she had her first replacement.<br />
I am glad we have all have health insurance. It is not perfect but I know those two would never have coverage if they lived in the US.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I went in to a BC hospital 2 years ago for a life-saving surgery. Well, I say life-saving because untreated, I would have had an internal infection etc. You guys know Testicular Tortion? Well I had it on a Fallopian tube. Dean Venture compared it to being kicked in the genitals and the kicker never removed his foot. Waited 1.5 days and got it all taken care of. It sucked for those days, but afterwards the relief was..indescribable.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>[United States] Right now, I&#8217;m in college because the $5K a semester for tuition is cheaper than what paying for insurance myself would cost (I use about a humalog insulin pen every week, and a box of 5 costs $250, I also take Lantus, use about a pen every week and a half, costs $250, use strips which cost $25 for a box of 25, and I take Paxil for $100 a month, so all in all, over $8,000 a year if I bought everything out of pocket even before factoring doctors appointments or emergency care into it) (never mind the fact I&#8217;d get laughed off the phone when trying to apply for private insurance)
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m a Canadian, Albertan to be specific. I don&#8217;t pay any provincial health care premiums, because we just got rid of those this year here in Alberta (used to be something like $52 a month for me). So doctor visits and the like would be free. But extended benefits (prescriptions, dental, vision) you would need to purchase a plan. I pay $245 for 1 year, and that covers 80% of the price of prescriptions instantly and gives me up $5,000 dollars in such claims.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>My mum had a scan and turns out she had bowel cancer, had surgery within the week, then some more a month later, and has a scan every 3 months to make sure it truely has gone. Cost &#8211; nothing</p>
<p>I had my nose flattened after I got mugged and after straightening it myself in the mirror went to hospital. Waited for 30mins, saw a nurse who said it was a bit wonky still and asked if I wanted it straightened. I said ok and they booked me in for 2 weeks time. Then I had it straightened and when I woke up the doctor said he also enlarged the passageway a bit since it was a bit narrow. Cost &#8211; nothing  Both these were in the UK.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>[United Kingdom] I am type1 diabetic, and, for me, *everything* is free, even scripts. Even if the medication is not directly associated with the disease. Why? Because it would cost more in admin, overall and in general, to differentiate. There are other diseases where everything is paid for, I think CF is another one. It&#8217;s things that require lifelong maintenance, that require lots of different stuff. We make more money alive than dead. The system is not perfect, but I&#8217;d take it over the system in the USA anytime, where ill health is a major cause of personal bankruptcy.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>When I lived in England, MRSA infections were common, poor sanitation procedures rampant, and there were many people who could not go to a NHS dentist because he was assigned over 2,000 patients. That&#8217;s not a system operating at a high degree of efficiency or to anyone&#8217;s satisfaction.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>In the last year of highschool, I got diagnosed with a really really bad case of ITP (idiopathic thrombocyclic pupura. Low platelet count). It resulted in several trips to ER, and I have a specialist doctor to deal with it. I also have to get weekly blood tests done. In the 4 years since I&#8217;ve been diagnosed, I have yet to pay a cent for my treatment, and honestly, while it&#8217;s a chronic condition, I still have a relatively high platelet count now. So, yes, competent, personalized treatment, and best of all free.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I live in the United States. I&#8217;m 27 years old and I owe a hospital over 30,000 dollars because I fell down some stairs and collapsed one of my lungs. I stayed in the hospital for eleven days. I don&#8217;t know how Ill ever pay it off. I&#8217;ll probably be paying it for the rest of my life.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>[United States] I broke my radius at the wrist when I was 19 but didn&#8217;t have insurance and was scared to go to a doctor because I didn&#8217;t have any money. I went to the drugstore and bought a wrist brace and wore it for six weeks until it healed. It healed all [messed]ed up, but what does that matter?</p>
<p>Fifteen years later, I saw my orthopedist for an ulnar nerve problem that required a cortisone shot to fix. I said on the form that I&#8217;d been having symptoms for about six weeks, which was before my insurance kicked in at my new job. While I was there for the ulnar nerve problem my doctor noticed that I had reduced blood flow to my hand. An MRI later, and it was shown that the malformed healing on my radius was repeatedly tearing up the cartilage in my wrist, which was restricting blood flow and I needed to have it fixed soon or I was going to lose the hand. I had one surgery to break the radius and put in two screws, a plate, and a bone graft, along with two pins to put my carpal bones back where they should be. Second surgery to take out the pins. Third surgery to repair a fistula in the scar tissue from the pin-removal incision because it was weeping fluid all over the place.</p>
<p>My insurance company decided, after pre-approving the surgeries, that they weren&#8217;t going to pay for anything after all because on the initial form for the ulnar nerve problem, I said that the symptoms had existed from before my insurance kicked in. They paid for the goddamned cortisone shot, but disallowed the surgery. I now owe $40,000 in various medical debts from that and a few other minor medical issues here and there over the years. This was WITH what is generally considered to be very good private insurance.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>My dad was diagnosed with bowel cancer. He went through the public system in Australia.</p>
<p>He was proactive sent a test kit by the government because he reached a certain age. He just had to use the kit and send it back and they sent him results. He then saw doctors for confirmation (including a colonoscopy. He had it removed surgically, with all of the standard drugs (including anaesthetics). He then spent a few days in hospital (6 bed room with curtains), with food provided. He&#8217;s since had a follow up colonoscopy which has confirmed the operation was a &#8220;surgical cure&#8221; in that they are as certain as they can be that the whole thing has been removed.</p>
<p>Total cost to him: $0.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Diabetic treatment requiring medication is completely free in the UK on the NHS regardless of income. Additionally,any other medical treatment you require is completely free, because you&#8217;re a diabetic. I mentioned this in another post but yours is asking the question directly, so I&#8217;m replying here too. I&#8217;m like you, type 1. All the stuff you describe is free, including checkups at hospital and at the GP. It&#8217;s been this way for years and years. I take lantus and novorapid (here we call it insulin glargine and insulin aspart) and use pens that take cartridges. I can phone or email the surgery for renewals, drop the script off at the chemist and it&#8217;s done. My regular, local pharmacist knows me (I&#8217;m registered on their system which serves all branches and is nationwide) but if I were to go into another pharmacist (different company) all I&#8217;d need to bring apart from my script is the exemption certificate which is a plastic thing the size of a credit card, renewed every 5 years.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve remembered another reason why we have this system for diabetes in particular. It is relatively cheap and easy to maintain a diabetic. However, the consequenses of having badly-controlled diabetes are horrific and expensive. Most amputations are a result of this. Charcot foot, leg ulcers, retinopathy and blindness, sclerotic arteries, kidney disease, neuropathy, premature death. Aside from humanistic principles, an economy doesn&#8217;t want this to happen to its workers &#8211; it wants them still working so it can tax them. A great way to have lots of poorly controlled diabetics is to charge them all for everything.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Toronto resident here. My dad has been diagnosed with liver cancer(hepatocellular carcinoma) and has been in and out of hospitals for the last year. Prior to being diagnosed, a load of tests were run, ranging from ultrasounds, CT scans biopsies and colonoscopies. All these tests were scheduled about a month apart, from October of last year until June. It&#8217;s only been more frequent (weeks apart) now that he&#8217;s been diagnosed. My aunt from Los Angeles lost her husband last year to liver cancer. One of the reasons was her husband was reluctant to get checked because the procedures mentioned above were anywhere from $200-600 a piece. Their family spent upwards of $50,000 for treatment and hospital fees, and finally hit a brick wall when the prospect of a liver transplant was $250,000. The doctor prescribed my dad these pills that cost about $6,500 CDN. And even then, we&#8217;re able to apply for a program where some of the expenses will be covered, or written off completely.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I pay $118 a paycheck for my family&#8217;s healthcare premiums. I get paid weekly meaning I pay a little more than $6000 a year just in premiums. When my wife has a baby this December I&#8217;ll owe somewhere in the range of $4000 out of pocket anyway. Assuming she doesn&#8217;t have to get a C-section again or there&#8217;s any other sort of complications.</p>
<p>My wife and I combined gross around $50000 a year. We are going to spend 20% of our gross income on healthcare this year. And I can&#8217;t wait until January when my premiums go up because I add a second child.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Went to the walk-in centre on Sunday morning at 10am. Out by 11am with some penicillin for my tonsillitis. Total cost: 7.20 ($11.89 USD) Went to Doctor on Monday morning. Rang for an appointment at 8.30am, in the door at 9.45am, out again at 10.30am. Total cost: nothing. Going to doctor again today. Rang for an appointment yesterday at 8.30am. Offered a 9am but couldn&#8217;t go due to work until this morning. Going to cost me: nothing.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m 26 years old and I owe doctors over $60k because of diabetes-related expenses that my insurance company refuses to pay since type I diabetes is a &#8220;pre-existing condition.&#8221; I have to forgo food sometimes, which is [really] dangerous, to buy testing supplies. I let my car insurance/inspection lapse because I can&#8217;t pay for them and my health&#8217;s more important. Insulin&#8217;s not an option.</p>
<p>This has pretty much wrecked my self-esteem and made me feel like a burden on my family. I hate having to ask for money and I feel like the most useless person in the world because I can&#8217;t even afford to take care of myself. I know that&#8217;s stupid, but years of fighting with doctors and insurance companies has left me feeling like nobody gives a [darn] and that I brought this on myself somehow. So now, on top of feeling sick and horrible because of diabetes, I get panic attacks constantly because I don&#8217;t know how to [fracking] pay for it.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>One of our neighbors was a professional craftsman and woodworker, then one day his wife went up to talk to him, and he blankly stared at her and said &#8220;who are you? who am I? where am I?&#8221; He&#8217;s 32 years old. She took him to the hospital. They discovered a large brain tumor, of a type of cancer I can&#8217;t recall but it&#8217;s incredibly aggressive and he&#8217;s going to die very fast. To get treatment, they had to sell their house and most of their possessions and move in with his wife&#8217;s parents, and now he&#8217;s just volunteering to be a guinea pig for random potential treatments because he&#8217;s doomed anyways. I think they&#8217;re something like 500,000 dollars in debt because of the surgeries and treatments he had to go through initially. He&#8217;s a very nice person and to see him not only get cancer, but then have so much taken in exchange for treatment just makes it so much worse.</p>
<p>I want the current US healthcare system to burn. I want the people running these huge scams to pay. The amount of pain and suffering caused by them, due to the simply outrageous costs attributed to sometimes trivial treatments is simply monstrous. Inhuman.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>We live in Toronto, and earlier this year my fiance was diagnosed with melanoma (skin cancer). It wasn&#8217;t life-threatening, but the problem with melanoma is that A) If you don&#8217;t get all of it there are zero treatments to get the rest and B) It comes back.</p>
<p>So she saw a doctor, who recommended a dermatologist, who recommended she go to the cancer clinic. We went there and saw another 2 experts who passed us on to a surgeon. Surgeon said she should have some skin removed, appt. was booked and a week later she had it removed.<br />
She was on some pills for a little while and has made a complete recovery, although she still has to keep an eye out for anything that looks &#8216;wrong&#8217;, and get checked out every six months.</p>
<p>Grand total for all of that, including surgery? About $20.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Both of my parents had cancer &#8211; dad in the prostate and mum in the bowel. My dads cancer was quite advanced, but my mums was found earlier. She discovered she had it and was scheduled for surgery in two months. Two months! For cancer! This is obviously disgraceful. The NHS doctor explained that they wait as long as possible for surgery on non-life threatening cancer (but not too long) so they can conduct as many tests as possible to find out exactly how advanced it is, what they need to do, and which drugs they need to give her in the run up to surgery to ensure her body is ready for it.</p>
<p>This clearly sounded like a pile of bull[crap], so she went to BUPA, her private health insurer, and got an appointment with one of their doctors. He told her, um, the exact same thing. And she wouldn&#8217;t be able to get the operation for three months because it wasn&#8217;t life threatening and they didn&#8217;t have enough doctors available to do it. They did offer her a private hospital room though, which wasn&#8217;t much of a payout for paying into this plan for 20 years.</p>
<p>All in all, she spent the next two months getting several blood tests and CAT scans, counselling from the NHS and information from a nutritionist on how to modify her diet to prepare her bowel for the fact that 30% of it was about to be ripped out. The operation went perfectly and she was put on chemotherapy immediately after. Total cost? 0.00.</p>
<p>My dads story was a bit less happy, but he had his operation in 3 weeks (he was in hospital EVERY DAY for the two weeks before that getting various tests done). BUPA refused to pay for his operation &#8211; why? Private health insurers pride themselves on people not dying, and when their &#8220;patients&#8221; (customers) actually do decide to die half way through surgery it affects their ratings. So they just don&#8217;t pay out if they think you won&#8217;t make it. And that&#8217;s what they did with him. He did make it and went on intensive radiotherapy and a cocktail of drugs, which he is still on. Total cost? 0.00.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>[Calgary] I broke my arm skateboarding a few years ago, waited for maybe 20 minutes in the ER (I was there at 5am, when the busses here start running&#8230; Couldn&#8217;t get down there the previous night and just dealt with the pain for a few hours) and paid $0 for it after hanging out in the waiting room for 20 minutes.</p>
<p>I have a friend who has been waiting for minor surgery for about 3 months now. Every couple of weeks, he gets a call letting him know that they need to reschedule the appointment. He&#8217;s not upset about it because he understands that people who are about to die take precedence over his abscessed tooth here in the real world. Likewise, he is paying $0 for this surgery out of his pocket.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The only bad story about Canadian health care system is once when I was kid and ill, my mother took me to outpatients to get treated. After taking a number and the nurse giving me a once over we sat down to wait for 5+ hours. We sat in chairs behind a pillar, they couldn&#8217;t see us and thought we left . After they saw us, they apologized and we were into see the next available doctor in minutes.</p>
<p>I was very ill in my early teens, and in a period of 1 week I went from our family doctor, to a specialist at the regional hospital to a specialist at the massive children&#8217;s hospital in Halifax. My Mother was diagnosed with cancer, less than two weeks later she was in surgery, and not long after that she started chemo. All this happened without breaking the bank.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I also had a kidney abscess when I was 20 that almost killed me (it would have if my brother hadn&#8217;t shown up at my apartment, found me naked and screaming about being on fire, and called 911). The hospital gave me IV fluids and took blood, and because I didn&#8217;t have medical insurance, they wouldn&#8217;t do the more expensive tests like a CAT scan that would have given them a conclusive answer as to what was wrong with me. They knew I had a raging infection somewhere in my body, but didn&#8217;t know where because they wouldn&#8217;t do the more expensive tests. They gave me some nausea medication and some high-test antibiotics and sent me home.</p>
<p>The next day, I was back to a 106 fever and hallucinating about being on fire, so back to the ER. I drove halfway across Houston to make sure I got back to the same hospital so I wouldn&#8217;t have to have tests repeated (and have to pay for them). They finally ran a CAT scan and found that I had a golf-ball-sized abscess in my left kidney and another one that was a bit smaller. Because I didn&#8217;t have insurance, they didn&#8217;t want to admit me but none of the public hospitals had any room, so they had to because otherwise I&#8217;ll die. The doctor who was assigned to me was a private practice guy, and really wanted to help me so he was willing to do stuff for free.</p>
<p>I spent two weeks in the hospital, and after the first few days, they were going to move me to a public hospital, but fortunately my mom colluded with her HR department to figure out how to get me eligible for COBRA coverage because I had only stopped being a student less than six months before. We paid the COBRA premiums retroactively, because they&#8217;re required by federal law to allow you to do that for six months after you become ineligible for an employer&#8217;s plan, and I got to stay at the private hospital and have IV treatment instead of having the abscesses cut out, which is what the public hospital would have done to get me out the door faster.</p>
<p>End result? I&#8217;m totally fine, and only had $27,000 in debt at the age of 20 because of the parts of my care that my insurance wouldn&#8217;t cover, even though they had negotiated with the hospital to have my costs reduced to what they would pay. the hospital welshed on that agreement and stuck me with the balance.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Just pointing out its not always sunshine in the UK. I fell over today trying to reach some magazines from the top shelf of a newsagent and twisted my ankle. Instead of taking me in an ambulance they told me it was &#8216;fine&#8217; and I should go home and &#8216;rest&#8217; it. They wouldn&#8217;t even offer me a lift back home because it was only &#8216;a few minutes away&#8217; and they had another emergency call (It was FOUR minutes away and I hurt my ankle). Anyway, If I was private I would have been taken to hospital and gotten the attention I need. Just my two pence.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>American here. A few weeks ago, my two-year-old cousin fell out of bed. His arm was swelling and was tender to the touch, and he said it was hurting him. His mom rushed him to the ER. Where they waited for EIGHT HOURS to be seen by a tired tech who took an x-ray, glanced at the kid and said &#8220;he&#8217;s okay, kids don&#8217;t break bones,&#8221; and sent them home with a nice hefty bill.</p>
<p>Kid&#8217;s still hurting the next day, plus the arm has swollen greatly, so mom drives him 50 miles to a different ER where he gets actual sensible and quick care. Turns out he&#8217;s got a broken arm. Furious mom calls first ER to find that the people who saw the kid the previous day didn&#8217;t even bother to look at the x-ray they took. Apparently, nobody knew how to read it. A two-year-old child was allowed to sit in pain for eight hours before being sent home by people who provided him no care and still get to charge for an ER visit and an x-ray.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Last year I suddenly became dizzy. I was dizzy every single moment of the day for weeks before I sought treatment. I went to a walk-in clinic. I saw a doctor in 45 minutes. I walked out with a vague idea of what the problem may be (they could do little without running tests or taking scans), and a Rx for something that they said may help. The drug turned out to be useless, but it only cost me $1, so no biggie.</p>
<p>Things got worse, and I went to the ER a week later. I waited 30 minutes in downtown Toronto. I got a CAT scan, and got my results an hour later. They set me up with an appointment in their neurology clinic, set for six weeks later. However, I managed to get an appointment with another neurologist through my family doctor for only two weeks later. I had an MRI three weeks after that. If the MRI had been marked as urgent, it would have been one or two days, the neurologist said. Total cost to me was just the buck.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>My father has been suffering from some kind of growth on his neck. He&#8217;s been for an ultrasound examination, an x-ray examination and an MRI, and was told he&#8217;d be scheduled for biopsy surgery as soon as the surgeon was available. That was two weeks ago. Fearing that it could be cancerous, yesterday he phoned up the department at the hospital explaining that he expected he&#8217;d have an appointment by now, and they explained that the surgeon was on holiday until the end of the month.</p>
<p>The person at the other end of the phone then asked what condition my father had, and after my father explained she agreed that he shouldn&#8217;t be waiting. He went to the hospital today for pre-surgery consultation, during the course of which they discovered his blood pressure is unusually high (he&#8217;s had a quadruple heart bypass in the past) and so fitted him with a 24-hour heart monitoring device to record his biometrics: he&#8217;s going back to the hospital tomorrow to have it removed and to discuss the results.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, between his call yesterday and his appointment today the hospital referred his case to a specialist in another hospital for an expert opinion. The specialist will let our local hospital know by tomorrow whether his surgery will require specialist assistance (i.e. whether the surgery should be done in our local hospital or the hospital to which his case has been referred). Either way, on Friday we will receive a date and time for his surgery, which is expected to be some time next week.</p>
<p>The total cost for both of us for all of this? 4.Time between my Dad reporting that something is wrong and the doctors scheduling him for surgery to remove a potentially cancerous growth? Three weeks. My Dad is 72.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I live in Norway. Last year I started having frequent Lung collapses (Spontanious Pneumothorax), I had 2 weeks in hospital, roughly 40 x-rays in total and a 5 hours surgery after the 4th collapse. I was on sick leave from work for 6 months in total with full pay and my hospital bill was 200 NOK, ($30). I have no health insurance as Norway has a fully socialiced healthcare.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>A few years ago, my mother started losing the use of her vocal cords. Her increasingly-croaky voice caused her to be fired from a phone reception job, so she decided it was time to go to her doctor. Our family doctor had to send her to a specialist, who then said that she needed treatment in Boston (several states away.) The procedure involved getting repeated shots of botox directly into the vocal folds with a huge needle over several weeks. Her insurance carrier explicitly said they&#8217;d cover it, so she handled the copay after each procedure and thought everything was all settled.</p>
<p>About six months later, she started receiving collections notices and angry phone calls. The insurance company had never paid their share of the specialist&#8217;s tests and the repeated injections, which added up to somewhere around $8-10k. She called the insurance company to find out why they hadn&#8217;t paid anything. Their answer was &#8220;sorry, your insurance coverage was terminated six months ago.&#8221; After further prodding and escalation, they claimed that her coverage had been terminated because she missed a payment in the exact month of her procedure&#8230; but, being quite a packrat, she still had that canceled check. She had kept every canceled check for the past five years, including all the ones from after they claimed her coverage was canceled. So they were still cashing her checks for a supposedly &#8220;terminated&#8221; account.</p>
<p>My mom faxed them an image of the check for the month in question showing that it had been cashed by the insurance company before the monthly deadline, so they changed their story and said she&#8217;d missed a payment four months before the procedure and that her coverage had been terminated at that time. They had approved the specialist&#8217;s costs and paid out to our general practitioner after that date&#8230; she had that cashed check for that payment too. It took almost a year of legal threats from a near-poverty line single mother to make them finally pay off the bill.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I grew up under what is (as far as I know) the longest running socialized medicine system in the U. S.&#8211;the one provided to soldiers and their dependents in the active armed forces. It pleases me greatly to see that this is finally being talked about in the media somewhat, though it exists as a shadow of it&#8217;s former self (i.e. most of the support for dependents is gone, and the military has experimented with proto-HMOs and the like for years, and of course, the VA being [messed up] due to under-funding/nobody giving a [crap]).</p>
<p>Myself and my younger brother and sister all received treatment through this system for the majority of our lives. While there are always scare stories, like a guy dying the waiting room, or the time my brother, age 2 and with a 104 fever, was made to sit in the waiting room in ice until he seizured, there are also stories of doctors with tremendous abilities who utilized themselves and their resources to the utmost. When I got shigella in my teens, the doctor I saw spent the whole day with me, gave me an MRI because, in his words &#8220;it&#8217;s free, it might help, and I need the practice&#8221;, and called me at school when I was feeling well enough to go to check up on me.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Calgarian here. I was at home alone some time last year when my appendix burst, so I had to call 911 for an ambulance. They picked me up, shot me full of morphine, took a bunch of blood, and ran a shitload of tests, x-rays, MRIs, etc as soon as they got me in to the hospital. I was in surgery within a few hours, and ended up having to stay in the hospital for a week.</p>
<p>A week or so after I was out, my guts started to ache again. I went to the clinic and got checked out, but they couldn&#8217;t find anything wrong with me. A few days later, it hadn&#8217;t gotten any better, so I went in for more x-rays. Again, they couldn&#8217;t find anything. After a few more days, I couldn&#8217;t even keep any food or water down, so I went to the ER and got more x-rays. It turns out the scar tissue from my first surgery was had become wrapped around my intestines and was choking them off. I was back under the knife in a few hours, and had to stay at the hospital another week. The only bill I received for all that was $350 for the ambulance ride, which ended up being covered by my insurance.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>My mom&#8217;s in a wheelchair from a car accident. She&#8217;s quadriplegic, and so she needs a lot of care.<br />
Our insurance won&#8217;t cover a visiting nurse or anything like that, so my dad has to come in from his job (but hey, it gives insurance!) to help my mom instead of being able to come in and eat a nice lunch with her.</p>
<p>He can&#8217;t have the job he wants because it doesn&#8217;t have insurance, and we literally cannot let our insurance run out because my mom&#8217;s quadriplegia is a [God Damn!] pre-existing condition. Yeah, that&#8217;s right, a car wreck is a pre-existing condition now. COBRA was soul-crushingly expensive when my dad lost his first job. Now he works as a cashier at a shitty job where no one seems to know shit about their job.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Australia again: My dad who is 65 had his first knee replacement at 48 (2 weeks in hospital), his other one 51 (7 days in hospital), his first one again at 60 (3 days in hospital) and the second one again at 63 (2 days in hospital). They told him the new ones should last about 15 years, so get ready to head in again. He had Brain Cancer when he was 26 which required a month-long stay in hospital, a follow up visit when he was 36 which I think he was there for a week or more from memory.</p>
<p>He did all this as a farmer, with private health care initially and a combination Private/Public when it came in when he was in his 30&#8242;s. He owes no money, but he did pay extra to get the same doctor back to do his knees the third and fourth time (which was around $3000 total). Strangely when he needed more details on his Brain cancer a few years he couldn&#8217;t get the original doctor (he had died), but his son had entered the business also and had kept his fathers notes, so Dad paid about a hundred dollars extra for a updated consult.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve had and am currently having a terrible experience with US healthcare. About six months ago when I was living with my then fianc I started having severe back pains in my kidney area. One night it became some of the worst pain I&#8217;ve ever had and he ended up driving me to the local emergency care center, despite me reminding him that I don&#8217;t have insurance. Once I got there all they pretty much did for me was run a scan, say &#8220;Yup, you got kidney stones. Go home and drink water&#8221; and send me home with a $3,500 bill that I still can&#8217;t pay, especially now that I&#8217;ve had to move back into my parents home (break-up) and I lost my job (which had no insurance benefits for part time employees and was the only job I could find at the time). I know it&#8217;s not as bad as the other stories in the thread but I still have panic attacks over paying it off, on top of the other problems I have, like severe depression and anxiety.</p>
<p>I just now managed to find a place that I think will see me for counseling for reduced fees but after seeing that list of medication prices earlier in the thread I&#8217;m panicking about being able to afford the medicine they might want me to be on. If I can&#8217;t, I&#8217;m really afraid of what will happen to me. I already feel so much like I&#8217;m burdening my parents and everyone around me that I really do feel they would just be better off without me. I really don&#8217;t know what to do anymore.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>My nine-year-old has been complaining about her shoulder hurting all day, and when she moves it certain ways I can see her wince or she&#8217;ll let out a little &#8220;ow.&#8221; I asked her probably ten times today if she wanted me to take her to the urgent care place to get it checked out, and she kept saying no, that it wasn&#8217;t that bad.</p>
<p>About an hour ago, when I told her to get ready for bed, she came into my room and said, basically, that she&#8217;d been lying all day about how much it hurt because she knew it was expensive to go to urgent care. Last time she went to urgent care was when she scraped her arm very badly on the fence and had a huge splinter that I couldn&#8217;t get out. She overheard me and my fiancee talking about how the insurance her father bought for her isn&#8217;t very good so the entire visit plus her meds were out of pocket because he hasn&#8217;t met her annual deductible yet. It was $75 for the urgent care visit and $100 for the meds, and, as she put it to me tonight, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t want to cost you and Erik a bunch of money again.&#8221; Needless to say, we&#8217;re going to urgent care in the morning. But hearing my nine-year-old worry about the costs of health care just broke my heart.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve been to the ER twice this past month, the first time they wrongly-diagnosed me after a 4 hour wait. The second time, correctly diagnosed. Charged over $1000.00 for each visit ($1260.60 for the first visit&#8230;haven&#8217;t gotten the bill for the second time but it was pretty much the same shit, so I figure it will be the same). The ER charge each time was $630.00.</p>
<p>It took two gallbladder attacks for them to correctly diagnose me. I get to pay for the incorrect diagnosis (acid reflux&#8230;yes, seriously) the first time.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Well, I live in the most conservative province in Canada, so of course we have the worst UHC, so here&#8217;s a fairly negative story: My dad had to get knee replacements 10 years ago, because of injuries he&#8217;d had when he was in his 20s (walked off a roof and landed stiff legged on the concrete below), and a year ago they started acting up again. Crazy pain, yadda yadda, turns out he had bone spurs growing in one of his knees. After a few months of barely being able to walk, they finally filed the spurs down, but there is a high chance of them growing back, and his knees still ache like crazy. He really needs another knee replacement but (and here&#8217;s where it gets crazy) they said he&#8217;s too young. Apparently if they do it now, it&#8217;s very likely that he&#8217;ll need it done again in ~10 years, and so they say they won&#8217;t do it until he is 60 (5 years from now). Meanwhile, he&#8217;s been unable to exercise and has gotten out of shape, which is particularly stressing given that heart problems and strokes run rampant in his family, and people rarely live past their mid sixties (which is why he exercised a lot).</p>
<p>Now, it&#8217;s not like they kicked him out on the street and said &#8220;come back in 5 years,&#8221; he got cortisone injections and physiotherapy, and a brace for his knee. His pain has died down considerably because of this, but he still really needs a replacement.</p>
<p>Out of all the visits, surgeries and other stuff, all he&#8217;s had to pay for is the brace. The wait times to see a specialist and get his surgeries have been really long, but that can be chalked up to this provinces awful government pulling the Reagan one-two of underfunding a public program and then pointing at it and saying &#8220;Look how [crappy] this is! We need a private system up in this [place]!&#8221; Luckily, their plan has failed so far, since all we have to do is look south to see how terrible a private system would be.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>5 years ago my father suffered a mild heart attack. My mother called the ambulance (didn&#8217;t have to check if it was covered), my father was taken to the hospital (closest one, there are no in- or out-of-network hospitals) where he also suffered a stroke. He was immediately rushed to surgery that took about 8 hours or so. Thankfully, my father survived his rather massive stroke and he stayed in their convalescence wing for two weeks. Once he was stable enough to travel they transferred him to another, nearby hospital that specialized in neurology. He spent over a month there (I want to say six weeks but it might have been longer, that period is a bit of a blur for me) recovering and doing rehabilitation. Even after he was released he spent months coming back to their rehab ward and I&#8217;m happy to say that my father is pretty much completely recovered but he lost a little bit of his peripheral vision on the right due to the stroke.</p>
<p>Total cost to my parents? The ambulance ride (I think it was $90?) plus whatever gas money it cost my mother to visit him in the hospital.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I live in America. As far as I know, my father is still paying off my mother&#8217;s chemo treatments. She died in 05.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>This happened to my mom. This past fall, she had surgery to remove pre-cancerous cells from her uterus and while they were in there, the doctors found other issues that created further complications, and she was told not to go to work until it was taken care of. After 84 days of unpaid medical leave, her employer let her go (as allowed by FMLA), and she lost not only her job, but also the health insurance that her employer had provided. Should I mention that her employer was the local hospital, the same hospital that was treating her, where she had worked as a microbiologist for 30 years?
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>One weekend I went to see my boyfriend and was having abdominal pains. I thought it had something to do with food I ate so I waited a few days but the pain seemed to be getting worse, so I visited the ER on Friday where they did an ultrasound, said I had gallstones and scheduled me for a visit to see a surgeon on Monday. I had the surgery on Thursday. The total time between my diagnosis and the surgery was less than a week.</p>
<p>I found out later that all the claims (ER, surgeon, anesthesiologist and the surgery center bill itself) were denied by my insurance as they thought it was a pre-existing condition. Granted, the gallstones didn&#8217;t just show up overnight but I hadn&#8217;t been to a doctor in years, so I had no knowledge of what was going on.</p>
<p>Although it was horrible timing I don&#8217;t regret having the surgery, since according to the surgeon my gallbladder started to rupture just as they were removing it. I now have roughly $10,000 in medical debt. The only good thing about the whole thing is that my $1,800 ER bill was written off because of my low income.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>My mom was diagnosed with cancer a year or two ago. We live in Canada, and she received surgery and radiation treatment all within a few months, and was on paid leave for many more months. I believe all that had to be paid for was the medication. I can&#8217;t even imagine how much it would have cost in the States. She&#8217;s fine and back to work now, and has only an 8% chance of reoccurance, if I remember correctly. She had also had a heart arrhythmia a few more years back, and within a few months had surgery performed at the Heart Institute in Ottawa by a very qualified heart specialist.</p>
<p>Also, my grandmother and step-grandfather had dual citizenship and lived in the States. When my step-grandfather had a stroke, they had to move back to Canada, because the costs would have bankrupt them. As far as I know, they had no trouble getting treatment here.</p>
<p>Also, I was diagnosed with diabetes earlier this summer, so I&#8217;ve been in and out of the doctor&#8217;s office, the dietician&#8217;s office, the optometrist&#8217;s office, etc. All of it&#8217;s covered by OHIP, and I can get appointments within a week.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>My grandmother was diagnosed with stomach cancer at the age of 77 and even though her best case prognosis was 3 to 4 months she still underwent chemotherapy. She lived for another 2 years in overall good health. That is time that I am thankfull for and it cost her nothing. At no point did anyone in the Canadian health care system say, &#8220;she&#8217;s too old&#8221;.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>My mother recently found out she has malignant cancer in her tear duct and part of her sinus. Unfortunately, this meant that she had to have her eye removed. The NHS set up a multidisciplinary team for her, an ENT Doctor, a cosmetic surgeon, an oncologist, and a prosthetics expert (for the prosthetic eye she will eventually receive) and she had surgery within a month. It&#8217;s been very traumatic for her, but she&#8217;s doing well now, and the total cost of the whole past 4 months or so of treatment (2 surgeries, about a dozen consultations with 4 different doctors) has simply been the cost of train tickets to and from the hospital (which also would have been free if we couldn&#8217;t afford that).</p>
<p>About a week after my mum&#8217;s first surgery, my dad collapsed at home and was rushed to A&#038;E where it was discovered he had a ruptured aortic aneurysm. He was given a 50% chance of surviving the major operation to repair it, and he required 10 units of blood but he survived. He spent 24 hours being ventilated, 48 hours in critical care (with a nurse dedicated to him, watching him 24 hours), 2 days in a high-dependancy ward, 2 days post-surgical ward, and a week on a general hospital ward. This all cost us nothing. He has been prescribed about 15 different medications &#8211; if he was under 65 this would cost about 7.20 a month (for all of them), but as he&#8217;s over 65 they&#8217;re all free. When he came home, we had the option of having community workers helping him do shopping, or prepare meals for him, and we do have the district nurse coming to the house every so often to check blood pressure, etc. Again, total cost is zero.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>US citizen here. In Arizona, broke my clavicle when a pothole sent me flying off of my motorcycle a few years ago. It was a clean break right in the middle so it didn&#8217;t hurt too bad (clavicle injuries are widely reported as the most painful form of bone injury). I was meeting up with a friend and had nearly reached my destination, so I drove myself the rest of the way and had her drive me to the hospital. I arrived at the hospital at about 10AM.</p>
<p>An hour of waiting and I&#8217;m brought into triage. &#8220;I flew off of my bike, now my shoulder hurts.&#8221; Simple enough. Six hours later, a nurse brings me back into an examination room. Two hours later, a doctor comes in. He asks me the same questions that they asked in triage. &#8220;I flew off of my bike, now my shoulder hurts. May I have an X-Ray now?&#8221; One hour later, someone brings me into the x-ray room. Takes about 10 minutes. I&#8217;m brought back to the examination room.</p>
<p>One hour later, the doctor returns. &#8220;Yup, your clavicle is broken. Here is a sling. Let me get you some pain medication. Do you have a primary physician?&#8221; I do not. &#8220;Let me recommend a good orthopedic.&#8221; One hour later, doctor returns with 10 vicodin pills. The injury was pretty sore all week, but I managed to ration them until I could see my orthopedic.</p>
<p>Time spent in hospital: 12 hours, it&#8217;s now 10PM. All I&#8217;ve eaten since breakfast is shitty vending machine food. Luckily I had fantastic health insurance through my parents, being in college at the time, so all of this cost me less than $1k.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Three days after my dad was diagnosed with cancer he was having major surgery for free by a top surgeon. Chemo and endless consultations, house visits by a nurse when he got too ill to have his chemo in hospital, all by our evil socialist NHS.
</p></blockquote>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=1141&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2009/08/14/healthcare-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawaii Civil Unions Bill Pau</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2009/03/27/hawaii-civil-unions-bill-pau/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2009/03/27/hawaii-civil-unions-bill-pau/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember that civil unions bill going through the Hawaii Legislature? It ended up passing by a wide margin in the House, but in the Senate Judiciary Committee it failed to pass by a 3-3 vote. It turns out that the full Senate can actually pull bills through committee if they&#8217;ve ended up in a tie, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that <a href="http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/07/stop-the-hawaii-family-forum-support-civil-unions-in-hawaii/">civil unions bill</a> going through the Hawaii Legislature? It ended up <a href="http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090213/NEWS01/902130379/1001">passing by a wide margin in the House</a>, but in the Senate Judiciary Committee it <a href="http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090225/NEWS01/902250411">failed to pass by a 3-3 vote</a>. It turns out that the full Senate can actually pull bills through committee if they&#8217;ve ended up in a tie, and on Wednesday the Senate cast their vote.</p>
<p>Eighteen of the twenty-five State Senators said they publicly support civil unions for homosexual couples. Unfortunately <a href="http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090325/BREAKING01/90325053">the vote to pull the bill from committee was defeated 18-6</a>.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://eqfed.org/familyequalityhi/home.html">Family Equality Coalition</a> <a href="http://equalityhawaii.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/letter-from-family-equality-coalition/">sent out a rather gracious letter</a> in defeat. The anti-civil union crowd was a <a href="http://equalityhawaii.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/stay-strong/">little less than gracious</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>What I found most hurtful was the people in the gallery who erupted into uncontrollable cheering and applause everytime a senator spoke in opposition to the bill.  It was clear that Senate President Colleen Hanabusa was not happy with the uproars as she tried her best the quell the mob-like crowd, dressed in red, that took over the gallery.  You would think a bunch of church-going, bible-toting, religious zealots would be more respectful.  Shame on them!</p></blockquote>
<p>Hopefully the tide is turning, and discrimination against homosexual people can end in Hawaii in the near future.</p>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=987&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2009/03/27/hawaii-civil-unions-bill-pau/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A reworking of an anti-civil union letter</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/25/a-reworking-of-an-anti-civil-union-letter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/25/a-reworking-of-an-anti-civil-union-letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawaii tribune-herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine if this letter were printed in a newspaper in America: This letter is in response to &#8220;Basic Human Rights,&#8221; by Michael Ra Bauchard. He said the celebrated tolerance of culture and religious diversity was gravely threatened in 1998 by voting against mixed race marriages. Hawaii is not a mixed race culture, and the people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine if this letter were printed in a newspaper in America:</p>
<blockquote><p>This letter is in response to &#8220;Basic Human Rights,&#8221; by Michael Ra Bauchard.</p>
<p>He said the celebrated tolerance of culture and religious diversity was gravely threatened in 1998 by voting against mixed race marriages. Hawaii is not a mixed race culture, and the people of Hawaii stood up and showed the radical few that make the most noise that they were against a breakdown of not only their culture, but their society. It was not because of religious extremists who deliberately mislead and manipulated the people of Hawaii. The people of Hawaii have a strong foundation of family structure and are smart enough to think on their own.</p>
<p>This weighs more than just &#8220;Human Rights.&#8221; It&#8217;s society that is going to pick up the bill. Do you as a &#8220;clinical raceologist&#8221; you ever stop to think about the people you affect? Or do you only think of your own selfish sexual desires?</p>
<p>It is also a scientific fact that not all skin colour is something you are born with, that you make that a choice. The majority of mixed race relationships are a choice, due to the excuse of past racial abuse, physical abuse, or even something fun to try.</p>
<p>It is also a scientific fact that the healthiest children, who will make up a healthy society, are those raised in a secure family structure of both white mother and white father. We already have so many children being raised by single parents.</p>
<p>By allowing mixed-race unions, we will be opening doors that will not be able to be closed. But it&#8217;s your human right, having no thought to how it affects others.</p>
<p>Right now, there are vicious court battles going on with mixed-race unions and children that are being torn apart because selfish adults and their human rights. It&#8217;s bad enough that this is already being done in today&#8217;s white society, but to add to it with mixed-race unions is even more destructive and confusing for children.</p>
<p>So I also encourage Hawaii residents to get behind our state representatives and take a courageous stand to vote &#8220;no&#8221; on civil unions. It isn&#8217;t a human right. Don&#8217;t you see? The colours don&#8217;t match! Why are you trying to make something unnatural, natural?</p>
<p>Colliene</p>
<p>Pahoa</p></blockquote>
<p>Switch &#8220;mixed race&#8221; for &#8220;same sex&#8221; and you&#8217;ve got <a href="http://www.hawaiitribune-herald.com/articles/2009/02/25/opinion/your_views/letters01.txt">a letter published in today&#8217;s Hawaii Tribune-Herald</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=946&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/25/a-reworking-of-an-anti-civil-union-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;$140 million for something called &#8216;volcano monitoring&#8217;.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/24/140-million-for-something-called-volcano-monitoring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/24/140-million-for-something-called-volcano-monitoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bobby jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usgs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal delivered the Republican response to President Barack Obama&#8216;s speech to Congress. In it he poked at the recently-passed stimulus package which contains, in his words, $140 million for something called &#8220;volcano monitoring.&#8221; Never mind that the $140 million is actually for more than volcano monitoring, I&#8217;d just like to say [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Louisiana Governor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Jindal">Bobby Jindal</a> delivered the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/24/sotn.jindal.transcript/">Republican response</a> to President <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama">Barack Obama</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/24/sotn.obama.transcript/">speech to Congress</a>. In it he poked at the recently-passed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act">stimulus package</a> which contains, in his words,<br />
<blockquote>$140 million for something called &#8220;volcano monitoring.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Never mind that the $140 million is actually for <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/authority/2009/02/fact_checking_the_republican_r.php">more than volcano monitoring</a>, I&#8217;d just like to say that as someone who lives on an <a href="http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/kilauea/">active volcano</a>, Bobby Jindal can go fuck himself.</p>
<p>I want the USGS to monitor volcanoes. I want them to give warnings when a volcano is going to erupt. I want them to <a href="http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/volgaspollution.php">monitor gas output</a>. I want them to monitor earthquakes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet I&#8217;m not alone. I&#8217;m sure people in Washington would like to know if Mount Baker, Glacier Peak, Mount Adams, Mount Rainier, or Mount St. Helens are going to erupt. I&#8217;m sure people in Oregon would like to know if Mount Hood, Mount Jefferson, Three Sisters, Newberry Volcano, and Crater Lake are going to erupt. I&#8217;m sure people in Northern California would like to know if Medicine Lake volcano, Mount Shasta, and Lassen Peak are going to erupt. I&#8217;m sure people in Alaska would like to know if any number of volcanoes are going to erupt, particularly Mount Redoubt. I&#8217;m sure people in Hawaii would like to know if Mauna Loa is going to erupt. I&#8217;m sure people in Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho would like to know if Yellowstone is going to erupt.</p>
<p>Besides, it&#8217;s not just for volcano monitoring! One of the other things this money&#8217;s going towards is replacement and upgrades of stream gages. It might be nice knowing if a stream or river is rising. Useful to know if you need to prepare for flooding.</p>
<p>And he shrugs it off. &#8220;Volcano monitoring.&#8221; Pfft. Who needs to look at volcanoes?</p>
<p>Fuck you Bobby Jindal.</p>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=944&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/24/140-million-for-something-called-volcano-monitoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mormons funding Hawaii civil union attack website?</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/17/mormons-funding-hawaii-civil-union-attack-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/17/mormons-funding-hawaii-civil-union-attack-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honolulu rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latter day saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mormon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember how I talked about Hawaii Family Forum and its efforts to stop civil unions in Hawaii? Well, it turns out that they&#8217;re getting some help. And if you&#8217;ve read my post on California&#8217;s Proposition 8 you&#8217;ll recognize the funders. Andrew Cooper (via Rick MacPherson&#8217;s post) dug up some unsurprising news: a horrid website trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember how I talked about <a href="http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/07/stop-the-hawaii-family-forum-support-civil-unions-in-hawaii/">Hawaii Family Forum and its efforts to stop civil unions in Hawaii</a>? Well, it turns out that they&#8217;re getting some help. And if you&#8217;ve read my post on <a href="http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/05/california-what-the-fuck/">California&#8217;s Proposition 8</a> you&#8217;ll recognize the funders.</p>
<p><a href="http://darkerview.com/darkview/">Andrew Cooper</a> (via <a href="http://coralnotesfromthefield.blogspot.com/2009/02/mormon-homophobes-go-hawaiian.html">Rick MacPherson&#8217;s post</a>) dug up some unsurprising news: a horrid website trying to foment dissent for the civil union bill is <a href="http://darkerview.com/darkview/index.php?/archives/878-Mormon-Carpetbagger-Politics.html">based in Orem, Utah</a>. 98% of religious adherents in the Provo-Orem area are Mormons.</p>
<p>That means the odds are quite good that the good ol&#8217; fancy underwear Mormons are bankrolling efforts to continue discrimination.</p>
<p>Shocked? I&#8217;m not. The Mormon church is extremely rich and uses its fortune to try to force its religion down everybody&#8217;s throat, whether by funding missionaries to spread their gospel to everybody who will hear or by trying to cram discriminatory laws through our legislatures. </p>
<p>Adding to this, Mr. Cooper has also found <a href="http://darkerview.com/darkview/index.php?/archives/879-Looking-through-an-Attack-Website.html">similarities between this attack site and one attacking Honolulu&#8217;s proposed rail system</a>. That connection is a little more bizarre, I have to admit.</p>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=930&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/17/mormons-funding-hawaii-civil-union-attack-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop the Hawaii Family Forum &#8212; support civil unions in Hawaii</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/07/stop-the-hawaii-family-forum-support-civil-unions-in-hawaii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/07/stop-the-hawaii-family-forum-support-civil-unions-in-hawaii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawaii family forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three bills have been introduced to the Hawaii State Legislature (HB444, HB878, and SB458) that would allow civil unions between same-sex partners. House Bill 444 has a large number of sponsors in the Legislature, and on Thursday the House Judicial Committee recommended that it be passed. While it&#8217;s about time that this sort of thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three bills have been introduced to the Hawaii State Legislature (<a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&#038;billnumber=444">HB444</a>, <a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&#038;billnumber=878">HB878</a>, and <a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&#038;billnumber=458">SB458</a>) that would allow civil unions between same-sex partners. House Bill 444 has a large number of sponsors in the Legislature, and on Thursday the House Judicial Committee recommended that it be passed.</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s about time that this sort of thing get passed in Hawaii, it&#8217;s not without its detractors. Take, for example, <a href="http://www.hawaiifamilyforum.org/">Hawaii Family Forum</a>. <a href="http://twitter.com/CanSpice/status/1184120375">As I said on Twitter</a>, you can tell when an organization is stuck in the 1950s when it has &#8220;Family&#8221; in its name. Hawaii Family Forum is a fine example. As I found out yesterday* Hawaii Family Forum and the Roman Catholic Church (big surprise) are <a href="http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?fa591b74-526f-4cfa-a6fc-78a6c2e7688d">urging constituents to call their elected officials</a> to get them to vote against the civil union bills.</p>
<p>Well, okay, they have every right to do so. But let&#8217;s look at their <a href="http://www.hawaiifamilyforum.org/documents/CivilUnion_PositionPaper.pdf">talking points on civil unions</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The people have spoken.  In 1998, the people of Hawaii sent a clear message that marriage in Hawaii must remain between one man and one woman.  Civil unions are just another attempt to thwart the will of the people.  This civil union proposal is an attempt to legitimize gay marriage simply by using another title.  The people have also spoken through their representatives in reaching the artful compromise that established Hawaii’s reciprocal beneficiary law.  The law achieved the goal of providing benefits – without basing those benefits on the ill-advised sex-partner status test.  The people of Hawaii have put these issues behind them.  The legislature should not re-open divisive, controversial battles that have already been settled by the people.</p></blockquote>
<p>This refers to <a href="http://hawaii.gov/lrb/con/constitution/CONST%200001-0023.html">Article I, Section 23</a> of the Hawaii State Constitution which reads, &#8220;The legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples.&#8221; The counter-argument to this is one of the arguments that the &#8220;no gay marriage&#8221; crowd sometimes trots out: civil unions aren&#8217;t marriage. Here&#8217;s how that argument goes: &#8220;We don&#8217;t want gay people to get married because marriage is a sacred institution. Why can&#8217;t gay people have civil unions instead?&#8221;</p>
<p>Besides, laws are enacted with specific language and wording for a reason: to make things clearer. In the eyes of the law, only gay marriage is banned in Hawaii. Gay civil unions aren&#8217;t.</p>
<blockquote><p>Hawaii already has a reciprocal beneficiary law.  In 1997 the Reciprocal Beneficiary Act HRS §572C (RBA) became law.  This law allows two persons who are legally prohibited from marrying one another under state law to register their reciprocal beneficiary relationship by filing a notarized declaration with the state director of health. The RBA affords reciprocal beneficiaries certain rights that previously were reserved to spouses, for example, standing to sue for wrongful death and other tort claims, rights to an elective share upon death, authority to make health care decisions, rights to workers&#8217; compensation benefits, rights to receive payments of wages on the death of an employee, and rights to family leave under state law.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is quite true. However, it doesn&#8217;t afford gay couples the same rights as straight couples. As Hawaii Family Forum points out, it only affords certain rights and not equal rights.</p>
<blockquote><p>Do we want to save the “name” of marriage, or do we want to save “marriage?” Civil unions, same-sex marriages, and domestic partnerships have the same effect of destroying marriage as we know it.  When governments offer sex-partner benefits, they are essentially endorsing &#8220;gay marriage.&#8221;  These sex-partner benefits send the message of government sanction of such relationships and take us one short step away from legalizing &#8220;marriage&#8221; between two people of the same sex.  Marriage by any other name is still marriage.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t actually see an argument against civil unions here, other than the vapid &#8220;civil unions&#8230; have the same effect of destroying marriage as we know it.&#8221; The best counter-argument to this talking point is &#8220;so?&#8221;</p>
<p>This points to their first point, where gay marriage is banned in the State Contitution. Well, unfortunately for the discriminatory voters back then, they didn&#8217;t allow for a broader definition of the word &#8220;marriage&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>Those who would redefine marriage often insist that the only necessary qualification for marriage is &#8220;love.&#8221;  Yet if one accepts that rationale, then there can logically be no boundaries as to what constitutes marriage; any combination or number of consenting individuals must ultimately gain the same legal and societal sanction as traditional marriage. While love is vital, it is not the definitional element of marriage. We love many people we do not marry.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is part of the &#8220;slippery slope&#8221; argument that usually goes something like &#8220;if we allow gay marriage then we&#8217;ll have to allow polygamists to marry and we&#8217;ll have to allow people to marry their dogs and we&#8217;ll have to allow people to marry trees and oh god it&#8217;s all so horrible.&#8221; Well, no. See, polygamy is a choice. Bestiality is a choice. Being gay isn&#8217;t. There&#8217;s no slippery slope here, you just have to stop discrimination against people for being what they are. Banning polygamy is banning a lifestyle choice, and homosexuality isn&#8217;t a choice. See, there&#8217;s a difference here.</p>
<p>Besides, people marry for reasons other than love all the time.</p>
<blockquote><p>Marriage is not an American invention. It has existed as an institution since the beginning of civilization, and thus transcends our modern laws. Every long-standing society has viewed marriage as a union of male and female. Studies of previous civilizations reveal that when societies deviate from the standard of marriage as the foundation of its society, they inevitably deteriorate and eventually disintegrate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Slavery was around before the United States came along, and the US banned that. Human sacrifice was around before the United States came along, and the US banned that. Discrimination towards gay people was around before the United States came along, and it&#8217;s about time that something was done about banning that too.</p>
<p>I for one would like to see some of these studies mentioned in this talking point. Especially those that make a direct link between deviations from the standard of marriage and the downfall of society.</p>
<blockquote><p>Traditional marriage and family should not be undermined.  The data are clear and irrefutable &#8211; children do best in stable, healthy homes with both a mom and dad.  Hawaii’s children must have healthy examples.  Today, with 25 million children fatherless, it is callous to the extreme to be rewriting our most basic marriage laws to suit the desires of adults.</p></blockquote>
<p>This argument never made any sense to me. &#8220;Heterosexual people suck at marriage, therefore homosexual people can&#8217;t do it.&#8221; Maybe Hawaii Family Forum should concentrate on getting heteros to stay together in marriage instead of spreading more seeds of discrimination against homos?</p>
<blockquote><p>People should not be granted special legal protection and benefits based on their sexual preferences and behaviors.</p></blockquote>
<p>The &#8220;sexual preferences&#8221; fallacy aside, I actually agree with this. Therefore I think Hawaii Family Forum will join me in calling for an end to special legal protection and benefits for heterosexual couples. Why should heteros get special rights that not everybody can have? That&#8217;s what special rights are, rights afforded to one group but not another! Ban straight marriage!</p>
<p>Oh, is that not their argument? Then I still agree with them, there should be no special rights for certain groups, so let&#8217;s give everybody the same rights!</p>
<p>Because that&#8217;s what this is all about: equal rights. What happened to the Declaration of Independence?</p>
<blockquote><p>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.</p></blockquote>
<p>Are all men not created equal? Are you only equal if you like penis-in-vagina? I don&#8217;t remember reading that clause anywhere.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re at all concerned about equal rights, speak out against Hawaii Family Forum and other discriminatory groups like them. Speak out in favour of equal rights legislation in your State Legislatures.</p>
<p>* I&#8217;d originally linked to the Twitter post where I found out about Hawaii Family Forum and its stance on civil unions, but on request of that post&#8217;s author I&#8217;ve removed their name and the link to the post.</p>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=893&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2009/02/07/stop-the-hawaii-family-forum-support-civil-unions-in-hawaii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word of the week: prorogue</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2008/12/04/word-of-the-week-prorogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2008/12/04/word-of-the-week-prorogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prorogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may recall that in October Canada held an election. Many Canadians found this to be a waste of time and money, as the election changed nothing other than the numbers of seats each party held &#8212; the Conservatives still held the most seats but still formed a minority government, the Liberals lost seats but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may recall that in October <a href="http://www.canspice.org/2008/10/14/canada-election-2008-cbc-calls-conservative-minority/">Canada held an election</a>. Many Canadians found this to be a waste of time and money, as the election changed nothing other than the numbers of seats each party held &#8212; the Conservatives still held the most seats but still formed a minority government, the Liberals lost seats but still formed the Official Opposition, and the Bloc Qu&eacute;b&eacute;cois and the NDP brought up the rear. The election cost $300 million, and was actually held contrary to the <a href="http://canadaonline.about.com/od/bills/p/electiondates.htm">Fixed Election Dates Act</a> that the Conservatives themselves brought in.</p>
<p>Some analysts say that the Conservatives brought about the election in an attempt to get enough seats in Parliament to form a majority government, and thus have enough power to push their desires through Parliament without having to bend to the wishes of the other, more left-leaning, parties. Others say that the Conservatives saw the economic downturn coming and, realizing that right-leaning parties typically fare worse under weakening economic times, tried to gain a majority in Parliament before their party&#8217;s fortune weakened with the economy. In any case, the Conservatives maintained their tenuous grasp on leading Canada.</p>
<p>On November 27, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty provided his fiscal update to the House of Commons, which included a suspension of the right of public employees to go on strike until 2011, the selling-off of Crown assets, and the elimination of public funding for political parties. The latter point enraged the other parties. In Canada, political parties receive $1.95 for every vote they get in a federal election. This tends to help smaller parties more, as they receive less money in donations and rely on public funding to keep running. The Conservatives are the least reliant on these funds, as they make up 37% of the money they received in 2007. For the Liberals, this funding made up 63% of the money they received, the NDP 57%, the Green Party 65%, and the Bloc Qu&eacute;b&eacute;cois a whopping 86%. The three opposition parties stated that they would not support this fiscal update in a vote on December 1.</p>
<p>As fiscal votes are votes of confidence in Parliamentary governments, if a majority of members vote against a fiscal vote this means that the House has lost confidence in the leadership, and this typically spurs the Governor General (the Queen&#8217;s representative in Canada) to dissolve Parliament. This was what the Conservative government faced last week.</p>
<p>Flaherty announced that he would not bring the update before the House, averting that crisis. However, December 1 was also to be an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_day">opposition day</a> where the opposition parties set the agenda. This meant that the opposition parties could schedule a vote of confidence in the government, and this vote would probably result in a &#8220;no confidence&#8221; outcome. This opposition day was cancelled by the Conservatives, and the next one would be held on December 8.</p>
<p>Since then the Liberals and the NDP have come to an agreement to form a coalition party. This coalition would hold 114 seats to the Conservatives 143 and thus still not hold a majority of seats. The Bloc Qu&eacute;b&eacute;cois have come out in support of the coalition, stating that they would support the coalition on confidence votes. Thus the coalition would, for the all-important confidence votes, have another 49 seats, giving them 163, a majority of the 308 seats in Canada&#8217;s House of Commons.</p>
<p>This left Prime Minister Stephen Harper with few options. He could dissolve Parliament, thus forcing another election. This option would be looked upon disfavourably by the public. He could ask the Governor General to prorogue Parliament until January, which means that Parliament would be suspended and not meet until then. He could ask the GG to prorogue Parliament for up to a year. He could also resign as Prime Minister, forcing the Governor General to request that Parliament form a new government, which would allow the Liberal/NDP coalition to form the government.</p>
<p>Today <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/12/04/harper-jean.html">Stephen Harper asked Governor General Micha&euml;lle Jean to prorogue Parliament until January 26</a>.</p>
<p>Now, here&#8217;s my take. Readers probably know that I&#8217;m a leftie. I voted for the NDP in the last election. I don&#8217;t like Stephen Harper one bit. I think that his decision to prorogue Parliament until January is a case of taking his ball and going home. Canada is currently in the mires of an economic downturn, and Canada needs a government that will do something about it. Instead Harper suspends Parliament and forces nothing to happen for seven weeks, all because his tenuous grasp on power was threatened. This is the man that is supposed to lead Canada? This is the man who says he has Canada&#8217;s interests at heart?</p>
<p>Stephen Harper is a dangerous man, and this move must backfire. One can never overestimate the intelligence of the Canadian electorate, however.</p>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=760&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2008/12/04/word-of-the-week-prorogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California: what the fuck?</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/05/california-what-the-fuck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/05/california-what-the-fuck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously California, what the fuck is wrong with you? I thought you were all granola-eating tree-hugging leftie communist pinkos. I thought you were all for the gay lifestyle. I thought you were all for equality. You guys used to piss off the social conservatives all the time, what with your San Franciscos and your Berkeleys. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously California, what the fuck is wrong with you? I thought you were all granola-eating tree-hugging leftie communist pinkos. I thought you were all for the gay lifestyle. I thought you were all for equality. You guys used to piss off the social conservatives all the time, what with your San Franciscos and your Berkeleys.</p>
<p>But no, apparently <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYvCorqpqrGEO7TVJ3sUbraQ7MHQ">you&#8217;re all a bunch of bigots</a>. At least, 52% of you are.</p>
<p>Come on, what the fuck? Since when has California been a beacon for bigotry? Since when has California been a beacon for intolerance? Since when has California been a beacon for fear and hatred? That sort of thing we expect out of backwards states like Arkansas, but California?</p>
<p>Jesus Christ you Californians are fucking idiots.</p>
<p>This Proposition 8 has had its share of mouth-breathers come out of the woodwork. People like Howard Ahmanson Jr. who donated $1,395,000 to help pass Proposition 8. He&#8217;s said that his “goal is the total integration of biblical law into our lives.” Fuck you, Howard Ahmanson Jr. Leave your &#8220;biblical law&#8221; out of my life. I suppose now you&#8217;re going to be campaigning for banning figs or some other bit of idiocy that&#8217;s in the bible.</p>
<p>People like Terry Caster and his family, along with his A-1 Self Storage business. The Casters donated $693,000 to help pass Proposition 8. He says that &#8220;without solid marriage you are going to have a sick society.&#8221; Go fuck yourself, Terry Caster. And fuck your son Craig too, who&#8217;s the founder and pastor of Family Discipleship Ministries in San Diego. Fuck you, Craig Caster.</p>
<p>This whole &#8220;gay marriage is dangerous to society and marriage&#8221; thing is horseshit. Seriously. How does two men getting married affect you in any way? Gay people are going to live together regardless, so does giving them a marriage certificate make your marriage unstable? &#8220;Hey shit John and Steve are married, let&#8217;s get a divorce.&#8221; What the fuck? When gay marriage was legal in California did heterosexual divorce rates go up? Face it, this whole Proposition 8 was just a way to get legalized bigotry. Now it&#8217;s perfectly okay to discriminate against gay people in California. Fuck you California.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a bit from <a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2008/11/a_revolting_proposition.html">Charlie Stross</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Here&#8217;s a good diagnostic test for whether a proposed law is bigoted: if it applies to a group of people, replace the subject group in question with &#8220;Jews&#8221; or &#8220;Blacks&#8221;, and see how it reads. If Adolf Hitler or the Grand Cyclops would approve, then it&#8217;s a fair bet that there&#8217;s something fishy about it. In the case of Proposition 8, how would you vote if it read, &#8220;Only marriage between Christians is recognized in California&#8221;? Or &#8220;Only marriage between white-skinned people is recognized in California&#8221;?</p>
<p>If you are a Californian voter and you vote for Proposition 8, then I&#8217;m afraid it means you&#8217;re a bigot. You favour depriving a subset of the population of their civil rights, you are willing to vote for a measure that will destroy existing marriages, and you will refuse to honour marriage contracts acknowledged elsewhere in the world. And you&#8217;ve tacitly admitted that your own marriage does need protecting (which is kind of pathetic).</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also providing aid and comfort to bigots and intolerant, murderous fundamentalists elsewhere on the planet, for which the rest of us (who have to deal with our own local nutjobs) will not thank you. When one state or nation passes a law like this one, it encourages activists elsewhere to campaign for their own equivalent. The organizations backing of Proposition 8 aren&#8217;t Californian — they&#8217;re mostly national or international, and they will take a victory in the polls in California and push it for all it&#8217;s worth elsewhere. So if you vote for Proposition 8 and it passes, you can rest assured that you&#8217;ve done your bit for bigotry not only at home, but in the rest of the world.</p></blockquote>
<p>In case you&#8217;re wondering, here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.californiansagainsthate.com/dishonorRoll.html">list of troglodytes who donated money</a> to help pass Proposition 8. Morons, each and every one of them.</p>
<div style="font-size:0.8em;">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/california" rel="tag">california</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/proposition+8" rel="tag"> proposition 8</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/gay+marriage" rel="tag"> gay marriage</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/bigotry" rel="tag"> bigotry</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/howard+ahmanson+jr." rel="tag"> howard ahmanson jr.</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/terry+caster" rel="tag"> terry caster</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/a-1+self+storage" rel="tag"> a-1 self storage</a></div>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=734&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/05/california-what-the-fuck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 US Election Resources</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/04/2008-us-election-resources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/04/2008-us-election-resources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s where I&#8217;m going to be getting election information from: BBC News election map &#8212; the proportional map is quite cool. It resizes states according to how many electoral votes they have, so you can see at a glance how well each candidate is doing without being skewed by places like Montana. CNN &#8220;Your Races&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s where I&#8217;m going to be getting election information from:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7697829.stm">BBC News election map</a> &#8212; the proportional map is quite cool. It resizes states according to how many electoral votes they have, so you can see at a glance how well each candidate is doing without being skewed by places like Montana.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/your.races/index.html">CNN &#8220;Your Races&#8221; tracker</a> &#8212; I&#8217;ve chosen to track presidential results in Alabama, Hawaii, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia; Senate races in Alaska (Begich vs. Stevens) and Minnesota (Franken vs. Coleman); House races in Hawaii 01 (Abercrombie vs. Tataii) and Hawaii 02 (Hirono vs. Evans); California Proposition 8 (ban gay marriage); and Colorado Amendment 48 (human life from moment of conception).</li>
<li><a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a> &#8212; most of the people I&#8217;m following are watching election results around the world, so their insight will be interesting.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably be watching TV as well, but I&#8217;m undecided as to which channel. Probably CNN with occasional jaunts to MSNBC.</p>
<p>What other resources are you watching?</p>
<div style="font-size:0.8em;">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/election" rel="tag">election</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/cnn" rel="tag"> cnn</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/twitter" rel="tag"> twitter</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/bbc" rel="tag"> bbc</a></div>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=732&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/04/2008-us-election-resources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Election Wish: No on Colorado&#8217;s Proposition 48</title>
		<link>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/04/another-election-wish-no-on-colorados-proposition-48/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/04/another-election-wish-no-on-colorados-proposition-48/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canspice.org/?p=729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh man, I completely forgot about Colorado&#8217;s Proposition 48, which reads: Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution defining the term “person” to include any human being from the moment of fertilization as “person” is used in those provisions of the Colorado constitution relating to inalienable rights, equality of justice, and due process [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, I completely forgot about Colorado&#8217;s Proposition 48, which reads:<br />
<blockquote>Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution defining the term “person” to include any human being from the moment of fertilization as “person” is used in those provisions of the Colorado constitution relating to inalienable rights, equality of justice, and due process of law?</p></blockquote>
<p>I hope this abortion of a proposition goes down in flames. I mean seriously, a 3-day old collection of cells is a person? Can anybody see the myriad problems with this?</p>
<p>Can pregnant women drive in the HOV lane?</p>
<p>Would pregnant women go into clubs or bars where minors are prohibited?</p>
<p>Do pregnant women get an extra exemption on their taxes because they have an extra dependant?</p>
<p>Can pregnant women collect child welfare benefits from the government?</p>
<p>How does a pregnant woman respond to census questions?</p>
<p>Suppose a pregnant woman has a miscarriage. Does she get charged with involuntary manslaughter?</p>
<p>Proposition 48 is a fucking stupid question and anybody who votes for this idiocy is a complete retard.</p>
<p>See also: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/03/when-is-a-human-human/">When Is A Human A Human</a> by the <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/">Bad Astronomer</a>.</p>
<div style="font-size:0.8em;">Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/colorado" rel="tag">colorado</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/proposition+48" rel="tag"> proposition 48</a></div>
<img src="http://www.canspice.org/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=729&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canspice.org/2008/11/04/another-election-wish-no-on-colorados-proposition-48/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
